WorldNetDaily: DNA 'sasquashes' Bigfoot claim.
These guys say it's a Bison, not Bigfoot that left the hair at the site of the Bigfoot sighting.
7.29.2005
7.28.2005
CSI - Sasquatch
According to the Edmonton Journal, there's a CSI style analysis going on on a clump of hair found after Sasquatch was sighted.
I don't think any analysis (short of an autopsy) can prove Sasquatch exists, it can only prove that it's a clump of dog hair or something. After all, if it doesn't match any known animal, that still doesn't prove anything to the skeptics.
The eyewitnesses don't need proof, they already know what they saw.
I don't think any analysis (short of an autopsy) can prove Sasquatch exists, it can only prove that it's a clump of dog hair or something. After all, if it doesn't match any known animal, that still doesn't prove anything to the skeptics.
The eyewitnesses don't need proof, they already know what they saw.
7.17.2005
Bigfoot does NOT have spots.
According to NBC5.com - Irresistible Headlines; Bigfoot Allegedly Spotted In Canada's Yukon Territory.
I can tell you for sure, Sasquatch does not have spots, stripes or patches. He's kind of a brownish color.
I can tell you for sure, Sasquatch does not have spots, stripes or patches. He's kind of a brownish color.
7.10.2005
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
